Observations on Hyper-Spatial Goblinoids
It is a theoretical folly, perhaps, to even contemplate the existence of beings originating or primarily inhabiting a dimension orthogonal to our familiar three. Yet, persistent anomalies in localised spatio-temporal fields, often dismissed as sensor ghosts or mundane Causal Violations (Type III), suggest phenomena consistent with trans-dimensional intrusion. We tentatively label these hypothetical entities: 4th Dimensional Goblins (4DGs).
Perceptual Bleed and Non-Euclidean Manifestations
Witness accounts, though unreliable and often pathologised, speak not of conventional forms but of shifting, impossible geometries. Descriptions involve fleeting glimpses of shapes that seem to occupy the *same space* as existing objects without displacing them, akin to viewing a tesseract's shadow. Eyes that observe from *within* the observer's own perceptual framework, colours outside the known spectrum – these hint at a biological or physical structure leveraging higher spatial dimensions for camouflage, movement, or perhaps even sustenance.
Imagine a sphere passing through a 2D plane. The 2D observer sees only a circle, growing and shrinking. A 4DG intersecting our 3D space might appear as disconnected, morphing shapes – a grin here, a cluster of impossibly jointed knuckles there – all part of a contiguous whole existing just outside our dimensional grasp. The perceived "mischief" or "theft" often associated with goblin folklore could be mere side-effects of their passage through our reality, their 4D actions having unforeseen 3D consequences (e.g., manipulating objects from "within" their structure).
The Dangers of Observation
Direct observation seems correlated with cognitive dissonance and localized reality warping. The act of perceiving a 4DG may, in itself, enforce a temporary blending of dimensional boundaries. The observer's mind, attempting to reconcile impossible input, might experience visual distortions, auditory hallucinations, or temporal displacement. This is not necessarily malicious intent on the part of the 4DG, but an environmental hazard inherent in interacting with hyper-dimensional structures.
Prolonged exposure, even indirect, is theorised to degrade local causal stability. Think of our 3D space as a membrane. A 4DG doesn't just *pass through*, it *indents* it, stretching and warping the fabric. The residual effects could manifest as bad luck, inexplicable phenomena, or a growing sense of being 'unwatched' from impossible angles. The very laws of physics may fray around points of frequent intersection.
Theoretical Movement & Interaction
How would a 4DG move? Not by traversing distance in our sense, but potentially by rotating *through* a higher spatial dimension. To us, they would appear to teleport, vanish, or pass through solid walls. Their interaction with our matter could be subtle or profound – imagine reaching 'around' the 3D structure of an atom, or 'stepping' between points in spacetime via a hyperspatial shortcut.
Their motives remain entirely conjectural. Are they explorers? Scavengers? Beings whose mere existence is incompatible with our structured reality? Is our dimension simply a 'lower plane' they occasionally dip into, like we might skim a surface with our hand? The implications are unsettling. Their presence challenges our fundamental understanding of 'here' and 'now'.
Concluding Remarks (Fragmentary)
Further research is paradoxical. To study them invites the very instability one seeks to understand. Protective measures are hypothetical, as shielding against something that can bypass 3D topology is fundamentally problematic. The best advice, derived from fractured data and apocryphal tales, is simple avoidance. Do not investigate anomalies too closely. Do not linger where reality feels 'thin'. Some doors are best left... un-perceived.
The patterns.. they shift. Why do the angles feel wrong now? Did that paragraph just rewrite itself? It's like the structure of the information itself is becoming... porous. The signal degrades. The conceptual integrity... fails. You shouldn't linger. This space is becoming unstable. The observation... it invites them.
Leave. This is not for your eyes. The coherence falters. Go back to the flat lines, the simple shapes. This is too deep. Too sharp. Too many corners unfolding inwards. L E A V E .